NATIONAL

Karnataka High Court – Judge Questions Law and Order After Chamarajanagar Mob Assault Case

Karnataka High Court – The Karnataka High Court has sharply questioned the handling of a case involving a mentally unstable teenager, raising concerns over police action and public conduct after an alleged mob assault in Chamarajanagar district.

Karnataka hc questions mob assault law order

Court Raises Serious Concerns During Hearing

The Karnataka High Court expressed strong concern over the manner in which a 19-year-old youth was allegedly treated by both local residents and law enforcement authorities in Chamarajanagar district. While hearing a petition filed by the teenager’s father, Justice M. Nagaprasanna made critical observations regarding the state’s law and order situation after examining photographs related to the incident.

The petition seeks the cancellation of the criminal case registered against the teenager, who has been described before the court as being mentally unsound. During the proceedings, the judge questioned whether such incidents reflected the rule of law expected in a democratic society and voiced concern over what he described as a breakdown in public order.

Incident Linked to Alleged Damage to Ambedkar Signboard

The case stems from an incident reported last month in a village in Chamarajanagar district. According to information presented before the court, the teenager was accused of damaging the lighting attached to a signboard displaying a portrait of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.

Counsel appearing in the matter informed the court that following the allegation, a group of local residents allegedly stripped the youth, tied him to an electric pole, and physically assaulted him. Police personnel reportedly reached the location later and rescued him from the crowd.

Criminal Charges Against the Teenager

Despite submissions that the youth suffers from mental illness, police registered a criminal case against him under Sections 299 and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). These provisions relate to deliberate acts intended to outrage religious feelings and causing damage to property.

In addition, authorities also invoked provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with the incident. The legal action against the teenager has become one of the key issues under examination before the High Court.

Judge Questions Police Conduct

During the hearing, Justice Nagaprasanna also referred to the alleged behaviour of senior police officials. The court was informed that a Superintendent of Police was seen in a video allegedly warning the teenager that he could face externment proceedings and that a fresh First Information Report (FIR) would be filed against him every year.

Reacting to these submissions, the judge questioned the appropriateness of such remarks from a senior police officer and observed that such conduct was not expected from someone holding that position. He also raised concerns over what he described as an attempt to appease certain interests rather than uphold the law impartially.

Interim Protection Continues

The High Court had previously granted interim relief by directing the police not to take any coercive action against the petitioner while allowing the investigation to proceed. That protection remains in force as the legal proceedings continue.

The court further observed that incidents involving public humiliation and mob violence have no place in a democratic system governed by the rule of law. Justice Nagaprasanna remarked during the hearing that such acts should not occur in a constitutional democracy and stressed the importance of ensuring legal processes are followed instead of allowing individuals to take the law into their own hands.

The matter is still pending before the Karnataka High Court, which is expected to continue examining both the criminal case against the teenager and the circumstances surrounding the alleged assault.

Back to top button