NATIONAL

EducationSystem – CBSE Class 12 Digital Evaluation Sparks Student Concerns Nationwide

EducationSystem –  Students across India reacted strongly after the announcement of the CBSE Class 12 examination results, with many expressing dissatisfaction over marks awarded under the newly implemented digital checking process. Several students alleged that the newly introduced On-Screen Marking (OSM) system may have affected their final scores, leading to frustration and confusion among candidates and parents alike.

Cbse digital evaluation student concerns

Students Raise Questions Over Unexpected Scores

Soon after the results were declared on Wednesday, social media platforms witnessed a flood of reactions from students sharing mark sheets, personal experiences and complaints about unexpectedly low marks. Many students claimed that the scores did not reflect their preparation level or previous academic records.

Among them was Samriddhi, a student from Army Public School, who said she had anticipated a much higher result based on her performance throughout the academic year. According to her, the final score was significantly below expectations despite months of rigorous preparation and long study hours. She described the evaluation process as discouraging for hardworking students.

Similar concerns were raised by Sparsh Tanwar, a science stream student from The Maurya School. He stated that his marks were nearly 10 percentage points lower than what he had estimated after the examinations. The unexpected outcome, he said, left him and his family disappointed.

Introduction of Digital Evaluation System

This year marked a major shift in the CBSE evaluation process, as the board adopted large-scale digital assessment for Class 12 answer sheets through the On-Screen Marking system. The initiative was introduced with the objective of improving speed, minimizing human error and increasing transparency during the checking process.

According to official information released by the board, nearly 98 lakh answer sheets were evaluated digitally this year. The move was considered one of the largest transitions toward technology-based assessment in the school education sector.

Education experts believe such systems can improve consistency in marking if implemented efficiently. However, the sudden increase in complaints after the results has also triggered discussions regarding the reliability and readiness of the digital evaluation process on a national scale.

Pass Percentage Records Decline This Year

The latest examination data also showed a decline in the overall Class 12 pass percentage compared to the previous academic session. This year, the pass rate reportedly stood at 85.20 per cent, lower than last year’s 88.39 per cent.

At the same time, reports indicated a rise in compartment cases, adding to concerns among students and parents. Many students argued that the combination of lower scores and increased compartment results has intensified anxiety surrounding the evaluation system.

Education observers noted that fluctuations in pass percentages are not uncommon, but the timing of the decline alongside the introduction of a new checking method has naturally attracted public attention.

Allegations of Technical Problems During Checking

Further controversy emerged after an examiner associated with the evaluation process, who chose to remain anonymous, claimed that technical issues may have affected the digital marking system. According to the examiner, there were occasions when marks entered into the system allegedly failed to register correctly.

The claims have added to student concerns, although no official confirmation has been provided regarding large-scale technical failures. Some education professionals have suggested that if isolated glitches occurred, they should be carefully reviewed to maintain trust in the examination system.

CBSE Defends the On-Screen Marking Process

Responding to the criticism, CBSE defended the implementation of the OSM system and stated that the process was introduced to ensure objective and transparent evaluation. The board maintained that digital assessment helps reduce manual mistakes and creates a more standardized marking structure across examination centers.

Officials also emphasized that modernization of evaluation methods is part of a broader effort to improve efficiency in the education system. While concerns from students continue to surface online, the board has not indicated any immediate changes to the current process.

The debate surrounding the Class 12 results has now sparked wider conversations about balancing technological advancement with fairness and accuracy in academic assessments.

Back to top button