Ghaziabad: Community Tensions Rise Over Stray Dog Feeding Dispute in Ghaziabad Housing Society
Ghaziabad: A disagreement over the feeding of stray dogs has turned into a serious community conflict at a residential housing complex in Siddharth Vihar, Ghaziabad. What began as a difference of opinion has now escalated into allegations of physical assault, harassment, and safety concerns, drawing the attention of local law enforcement. The matter has highlighted the growing challenges urban housing societies face when balancing compassion for animals with the safety and comfort of residents.

Background of the Dispute
The issue surfaced prominently at the Brahmaputra Enclave Society, where two young women have been regularly feeding stray dogs within the premises. According to them, feeding these animals is a humanitarian responsibility and an act of compassion toward voiceless creatures. However, their actions have reportedly been met with strong resistance from several residents who believe that feeding stray dogs inside the society poses risks to children, elderly residents, and overall public safety.
This disagreement is not new. Tensions between animal feeders and other residents have reportedly existed for some time, but recent events pushed the conflict into a more serious and confrontational phase.
Allegations Made by the Women
The two women approached the Vijay Nagar police station to formally register a complaint against certain society members. In their statement, they alleged that while they were feeding the dogs, some residents confronted them aggressively. The situation allegedly escalated into physical violence, during which the women claimed they were assaulted and their clothes were torn.
They further stated that such opposition and harassment have occurred multiple times in the past. According to them, this was not an isolated incident, and they had earlier lodged complaints regarding similar behavior. The women emphasized that despite prior complaints, the hostility continued, forcing them to seek police intervention once again.
Residents’ Perspective and Counter-Complaint
On the other side, a group of society residents also visited the police station to file a counter-complaint against the women. Residents claimed that the issue of stray dogs has become a serious concern within the society and that repeated incidents have made daily life stressful for many families.
The President of the Apartment Owners Association stated that residents are deeply worried about safety due to the increasing number of stray dogs roaming freely within the premises. According to the association, dog attacks and aggressive behavior have become frequent, creating fear among residents.
It was alleged that nearly 20 dog bite incidents occurred within the society over the past month. Residents argued that feeding dogs inside residential areas encourages them to stay within the complex, increasing the chances of attacks. They demanded strict action to ensure the safety of all residents, especially children and senior citizens.
Role of the Police and Ongoing Investigation
Local police authorities confirmed that complaints have been received from both parties involved in the dispute. The Assistant Commissioner of Police stated that the matter is being taken seriously and that a detailed investigation is currently underway. Statements from all concerned individuals are being recorded, and evidence is being examined to understand the sequence of events accurately.
The police have clarified that appropriate legal action will be taken based on the findings of the investigation. They also emphasized the importance of maintaining peace within residential communities and resolving disputes through lawful and constructive dialogue.
Broader Social and Legal Implications
This incident reflects a wider issue seen across many urban housing societies in India, where conflicts arise between animal welfare supporters and residents concerned about safety and hygiene. While animal rights laws encourage humane treatment of stray animals, residential safety and public order remain equally important.
Experts often suggest that such disputes can be minimized through structured solutions such as designated feeding zones, coordination with municipal authorities for sterilization programs, and clear housing society guidelines. Without mutual understanding and proper regulation, such conflicts are likely to continue and intensify.
Conclusion
The confrontation at Brahmaputra Enclave Society serves as a reminder of how unresolved community issues can quickly escalate into legal battles. As the investigation continues, the incident underscores the need for balanced solutions that respect both animal welfare and human safety. Constructive communication, clear policies, and cooperation between residents, animal lovers, and authorities may be the only sustainable way forward for peaceful community living.