TrumpSpeech – President Repeats Claim of Halting Global Conflicts
TrumpSpeech – United States President Donald Trump has once again asserted that his administration played a decisive role in ending multiple international conflicts, including tensions between India and Pakistan last year. Speaking during the 2026 State of the Union address before a joint session of Congress in Washington, Trump said that eight wars were brought to a halt within his first ten months in office.
Claims of Preventing a Nuclear Crisis
During his remarks, Trump stated that relations between India and Pakistan had reached a critical point and could have escalated into a nuclear confrontation. He claimed that his diplomatic intervention helped avert large-scale devastation.
Referring to events following “Operation Sindhoor,” which was launched by Indian forces on May 7, 2025 in response to the deadly Pahalgam attack that killed 26 people, Trump said Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had personally acknowledged his role. According to Trump, Sharif told him that nearly 35 million lives were at risk and credited his involvement with preventing a wider catastrophe.
“In my first 10 months, I ended eight wars,” Trump said. “Pakistan and India were very close to a nuclear war. The Prime Minister of Pakistan told me that millions of people could have died without my involvement.”
List of Conflicts Mentioned
In addition to India and Pakistan, Trump cited several other disputes where he claimed his administration facilitated peace or de-escalation. These included hostilities between Israel and Hamas, tensions involving Israel and Iran, and disagreements between Egypt and Ethiopia.
He also mentioned Serbia and Kosovo, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as Cambodia and Thailand. Trump did not provide detailed explanations of the specific diplomatic steps taken in each case, but maintained that American engagement was instrumental in easing tensions.
India Rejects US Role in De-escalation
Indian officials have consistently rejected assertions that Washington mediated or directly intervened to stop military exchanges between India and Pakistan. Since last May, Trump has repeatedly taken credit for preventing a broader conflict, but New Delhi has maintained a different account of events.
According to the Indian government, the understanding to cease hostilities was reached through direct communication between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both countries. Officials have emphasized that the de-escalation followed established military channels without external mediation.
When asked about Trump’s repeated claims, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar responded with a pointed remark, stating that the United States “was in the United States,” underscoring India’s position that the matter was handled bilaterally.
Ongoing Debate Over Diplomatic Credit
Trump’s remarks have added to the continuing debate over the extent of US involvement in South Asian security matters. While the White House highlights diplomatic outreach as part of its broader foreign policy achievements, Indian authorities remain firm that the resolution process was internally managed between the two neighboring countries.
Analysts note that public claims of mediation in sensitive regional disputes often carry political implications, especially when both sides maintain different narratives. For India and Pakistan, relations have long been shaped by complex historical and security concerns, particularly following incidents such as the Pahalgam attack and subsequent military responses.
As global tensions continue to evolve, questions surrounding the role of major powers in conflict resolution remain a recurring feature of international diplomacy. Trump’s latest address has once again placed that issue at the center of discussion in Washington and beyond.